Harris v. Rainey (Harris Class Action)/Bostic v. Schaefer

Challenge to Virginia’s Ban on Marriage by Same-sex Couples, Harris v. Rainey (U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg) Filed: August 1, 2013.  Counsel:  James D. Esseks, Amanda C. Goad, Joshua A. Block, National ACLU LGBT Project; Gregory R. Nevins, Tara L. Borelli, Lambda Legal; Paul M. Smith, Luke C. Platzer, Mark P. Gaber, Jenner & Block; Rebecca K. Glenberg, ACLU of Virginia.

Under Virginia statutes, persons of the same sex are not permitted to marry, and marriages and civil unions by same-sex couples in other states are “void and unenforceable.”  In 2006, Virginia voters passed a referendum enshrining this discrimination in the state constitution.  Joanne Harris and Jessi Duff live in Staunton with their four-year-old son, Jabari.  They would like to marry in Virginia, but are unable to do so due to Virginia’s discriminatory laws.  Christy Berghoff and Victoria Kidd live in Winchester with their baby daughter Lydia.  They were married in 2011 in Washington, D.C., but their marriage is not recognized in Virginia.  Both couples seek the legal sanction, respect, protections, and support available through marriage.

On August 1, 2013, we filed suit on behalf of Joanne, Jessi, Christi and Victoria against the state and the clerk of the circuit court, challenging Virginia’s refusal to allow marriage by same-sex couples or recognize such marriages performed in other states.  On August 16, 2013, we filed our motion for class certification and the governor filed a motion to dismiss him as a defendant.  The Staunton Circuit Court Clerk also asked to be dismissed as a defendant.  On December 23, 2013 the court dismissed the governor from the case, but denied the clerk’s motion to dismiss.  On January 31, 2014, our case was granted class-action status, and we now represent all of the same-sex couples in Virginia who wish to marry or have already legally married in other states and want their marriages recognized in Virginia.

In a separate case, Bostic v. Schaefer, a federal judge in Norfolk ruled on February 13, 2014, that Virginia’s laws prohibiting same-sex couples from marrying or having their out-of-state marriages recognized are unconstitutional.  The government defendants appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and the Norfolk judge’s ruling was stayed pending appeal.

The Fourth Circuit allowed us to intervene in the case, so that the class we represent is now a party to the Bostic appeal.  We filed our brief on April 11, 2014, and oral argument took place on May 13, 2014.  On July 28, 2014, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court decision, holding that Virgina’s prohibition on marriage for same-sex couples is unconstitutional.  On August 13, 2014 the Fourth Circuit denied the defendants’ request to stay the ruling.  The U. S. Supreme Court stayed the decision on August 20, 2014.

On Monday, October 6, 2014, the U. S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case and the Fourth Circuit ruling is now in effect.

Still have questions about what this means?  Check out our “Frequently Asked Questions” page regarding the case.

Court Documents (click the link to view .pdf)

Complaint – U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg

Motion for Class Certification – U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg

Memorandum in Support of Class Certification – U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg

Answer of Janet M. Rainey Regarding Class Certification – U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg

Motion to Dismiss Governor McDonnell – U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg

Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Governor McDonnell – U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg

Memorandum in Opposition of Motion to Dismiss Governor McDonnell – U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg

Motion to Intervene on Appeal in Bostic v. Schaefer, 4th Circuit Court of Appeals

Opinion granting McDonnell’s motion to dismiss and denying Schaefer’s motion to dismiss – U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg

Opinion granting motion for class certification – U.S. District Court, Harrisonburg

Order granting Harris Class leave to intervene in Bostic – 4th Circuit Court of Appeals

Harris Class response brief – 4th Circuit Court of Appeals

Fourth Circuit Decision

Harris Class Opposition to Michèle McQuigg’s request for a Stay – 4th Circuit Court of Appeals

Order Denying  Stay Request – 4th Circuit Court of Appeals

Response of the Harris Class Respondents to Application for Stay – U. S. Supreme Court

Additional briefs and materials related to the Harris Class Action and the Bostic case can be found on the national ACLU website.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Email this to someone